Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats — A Deep Dive 2026
Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats — A Deep Dive
On December 26–27, 2024, the Seattle Seahawks traveled to Soldier Field in Chicago to face the Chicago Bears in a Week 17 NFL matchup that would become one of the lowest-scoring games of the 2024 NFL season. In a defensive-slanted contest, Seattle emerged victorious with a final score of 6–3.
This article explores not just the box score, but every angle of Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats how players performed — from quarterbacks and running backs to receivers and defenders — placing these numbers in context and explaining their significance.
1. Game Overview
This matchup stood out not for offensive fireworks but for defensive resiliency, situational execution, and field position battles. The Seahawks’ special teams ultimately decided the game, as Jason Myers converted both of Seattle’s field goal attempts, while Chicago’s Cairo Santos connected on one.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Final |
| SEA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| CHI | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
This low score reflects two teams locking down offenses and forcing sustained drives to fail before the red zone.
2. Offensive Summary
Seattle Seahawks Offense
The Seahawks’ offense generated 265 total yards — led slightly more by the passing game than the ground attack — but crucially controlled key moments to set up scoring opportunities.
Chicago Bears Offense
Chicago managed 179 total yards,Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats struggling to sustain long drives and adjusting on the fly against Seattle’s defensive front.
3. Player Stats Breakdown
Let’s examine how individual players performed in the key offensive categories.
3.1 Quarterback Play
Seattle Seahawks — Geno Smith
| Statistic | Value |
| Comp/Att | 17/23 |
| Passing Yards | 160 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| QB Rating | ~92.7 |
Analysis:
Smith delivered an efficient, mistake-Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsfree performance. While the stat line doesn’t include touchdowns, his accuracy kept Seattle ahead of the Bears’ defense and limited turnovers in a cold-weather environment where possessions were scarce.
His ability to make timely completions — Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsespecially on third downs — helped Seattle sustain drives just long enough to flip field position and position Myers for scoring chances.
Chicago Bears — Caleb Williams
| Statistic | Value |
| Comp/Att | 16/28 |
| Passing Yards | 122 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| QB Rating | ~53.0 |
Analysis:
Williams showed flashes in his rookie season, but in this game, Seattle’s pass rush and coverage limited his ability to stretch the field. The interception — which came at a pivotal moment following a Bears possession flip — Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsprevented Chicago from converting momentum into points.
Chicago’s offensive plan also leaned heavily on the run, so Williams saw fewer opportunities to push the ball deep or generate big plays.
3.2 Rushing Attack
Seattle Seahawks Rushing Leaders
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average |
| Zach Charbonnet | 15 | 57 | 3.8 |
| Kenny McIntosh | 7 | 46 | 6.6 |
| Geno Smith | 3 | 19 | 6.3 |
Analysis:
The run game was methodical, not explosive. Charbonnet’s carries kept defenses honest, while McIntosh made the most of limited touches with a high average per carry. Geno Smith’s own mobility added a wrinkle when pressure collapsedSeahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats the pocket.
Chicago Bears Rushing Leaders
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average |
| D’Andre Swift | 12 | 53 | 4.4 |
| Caleb Williams | 5 | 37 | 7.4 |
| D. Moore | 2 | 8 | 4.0 |
Analysis:
Swift’s performance was respectable against a stout Seattle front, finishing with a positive average and showing versatility as both a runner and receiver. Williams’ runs provided unexpected gains and helped Chicago stay balanced offensively.
3.3 Receiving Game
Top Seahawks Receivers
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average |
| Noah Fant | 4 | 43 | 10.8 |
| DK Metcalf | 3 | 42 | 14.0 |
| Jaxon Smith-Njigba | 3 | 32 | 10.7 |
| Tyler Lockett | 3 | 20 | 6.7 |
| Others | — | — | — |
Analysis:
Fant and Metcalf were the offensive bright spots. In a game lacking deep threats from Chicago, both tight ends and wideouts operated inSeahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats intermediate routes, moving the chains and creating manageable third-down situations.
Top Bears Receivers
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average |
| DJ Moore | 6 | 54 | 9.0 |
| D’Andre Swift | 4 | 28 | 7.0 |
| Keenan Allen | 5 | 25 | 5.0 |
| Rome Odunze | 1 | 15 | 15.0 |
Analysis:
Moore was the Bears’ most consistent target, Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsfinding separation on intermediate routes and making contested catches when necessary. Allen and Odunze offered additional looks, but Seattle’s secondary limited explosive gains.
4. Defensive Impact
Though statistics above focus on offensive output, defense was the true story of this game.
Seattle Seahawks Defense
Seattle held its opponents under three points — a defense that rarely allows big plays. The pass rush consistently pressured Williams, resulting in sacks and forcing hurried throws.
Chicago Bears Defense
Chicago’s defense bent but rarely broke,Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats limiting Seattle’s big play potential. Chicago’s ability to make plays on third downs kept the contest within reach until the final whistle.
5. Special Teams — The Difference Maker
In a game with no offensive touchdowns, special teams played a decisive role.
- Jason Myers (SEA): 2/2 field goals (27 yd & 50 yd)
- Cairo Santos (CHI): 1/1 field goal (42 yd)
With two successful attempts, Myers accounted for Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsall of Seattle’s points. His long field goal was vital in a contest where sustaining drives was difficult against elite defensive units.
6. Strategic Takeaways
Seahawks
- Ball control and possession allowed Seattle to flip field position.
- Defensive pressure on Williams limited Chicago’s offensive consistency.
- Converting field goals when in range was the key to victory.
Bears
- The Bears’ defense showed grit, but the offense lacked sustained efficiency.
- Chicago’s run game was serviceable, but the passing attack couldn’t generate explosive plays.
- Turnovers at critical times limitedSeahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats scoring potential.
7. Historical Context — Head-to-Head Trends
Looking beyond this specific matchup:
- Overall, Seattle holds an edge in the entire history of Bears vs Seahawks matchups with more wins.
- This defensive contest mirrors several previous low-scoring battles in the rivalry.
While the rivalry has seen varying offensive outputs, this 6–3 game stands as one of the more defensive and tightly contested games.
8. Player Spotlight — Season Big Picture
Caleb Williams (Bears)
Despite this game’s challenge, Williams was recognized as the Chicago Bears’ Offensive Player of the Year, leading franchise records in passing yards and clutch drives.
His development as a young quarterback providesSeahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats optimism for Bears fans and executives alike.
9. What It Meant for the Season
For the Seahawks, this victory helped solidify a Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsplayoff push and demonstrated resilience in tight games — a hallmark of good teams.
For the Bears, the narrow loss highlighted areas for growth:
- Consistent offensive success
- Red zone execution
- Quarterback protection
Still, the season featured notable growth, including Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsclinching the NFC North division title — the first time since 2018 — proving their overall trajectory was positive.
Aký bol konečný výsledok a skóre hráčov vSeahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats poslednom zápase Seahawks vs Bears?
Seattle Seahawks 6 – Chicago Bears 3. Žiadne touchdowny – len field goals (Jason Myers 2× pre SEA, Cairo Santos 1× pre CHI). Obrana Seahawks dominovala.
Kto bol najlepší passer v zápase?
Geno Smith (SEA): 17/23 na 160 yardov, 0 TD, 0 INT, rating 92.7. Caleb Williams (CHI): 16/28 na 122 yardov, 0 TD, 1 INT (game-sealing interception).
Ktorý running back mal najviac rushing yardov?
Zach Charbonnet (SEA): 15 att, 57 yds (3.8 avg). D’Andre Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player StatsSwift (CHI): 12 att, 53 yds. Seahawks mali celkovo 122 rushing yds vs Bears 103.
Kto mal najlepší receiving výkon?
DK Metcalf (SEA) mal 3 catches na 42 yds (ale aj penalty). Noah Fant (SEA): 4 rec, 43 yds. DJ Moore (CHI): 6 rec, 54 yds (najviac pre Bears).
Koľko sacks mali obrany?
Seahawks defense: 7 sacks (Leonard Williams 2, ostatní po 1 vrátane Derick Hall, Jarran Reed). Bears: 3 sacks na Geno Smitha. Williams bol sacked 7×, čo je rekordný tlak na rookieho.
Kto urobil game-winning play?
Riq Woolen (SEA) zachytil interception na Caleb Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player StatsWilliamsovi v záverečnej minúte (na Seattle 29-yard line), čím ukončil posledný drive Bears.
Aký bol celkový yardage tímov?
Seahawks: 265 total yards (143 passing + 122 rushing). Bears: 179 total yards (76 passing + 103 rushing). Veľmi nízke čísla kvôli dažďu a obranám.
Ako dopadli turnovers?
Oba tímy mali 1 turnover. Seahawks: žiadne INT, Bears: 1Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats INT (Woolen). Žiadne fumble straty.
Kto mal najviac tackles alebo defenzívne highlights?
Leonard Williams (SEA) mal 2 sacks + vysoký pressure rate (18.2%). Tariq Woolen: game-clinching INT. Bears defense držala Seahawks na nízkych bodoch, Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsale neuspela v clutch momente.
Prečo bol zápas taký low-scoring (najnižší v sezóne)?
Daždivé podmienky, silné obrany (7 sacks SEA), slabá ofenzíva Bears (Caleb sacked 7×), Seahawks sa spoliehali na run game a field goals. Žiadny TD v zápase.
Ako to ovplyvnilo playoff šance tímov?
Seahawks (9-7 po zápase) si udržali šancu na NFCSeahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats West (potrebovali pomoc od Cardinals). Bears (4-12) prehrali 10. zápas v rade, sezóna skončená.
Ktorí hráči Seahawks mali penalty problémy?
DK Metcalf: viackrát unnecessary roughness (shoved Tyrique Stevenson, headbutt threat), 2 flags na jednom drive. Stále problém s disciplínou.
Aký bol 3rd down efficiency?
Seahawks: 5/13 (38%). Bears: 5/15 (33%). Oba Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statstímy bojovali o konverzie.
Kto bol kľúčový v rushing pre Seahawks?
Zach Charbonnet (57 yds) a Kenny McIntosh (46 yds na 7 att, vrátane 25-yd run). Geno Smith pridal 19 yds scramblingom.
Kde nájdem kompletný box score a player Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsstats?
Najlepšie zdroje: ESPN (boxscore), Pro-Football-Reference (detailný play-by-play), Seahawks.com alebo NFL.com game center. Hľadaj “Seahawks vs Bears Dec 26 2024 box score”.
10. Conclusions — The Seahawks vs Bears Match in Retrospect
This matchup was a master class in defensive strategy, field position battles, and value-based football where points were earned one yard at a time, and every possession mattered.
Key takeaways:
- Both teams displayed disciplined execution.
- Player stats reflected controlled, cautious Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsoffensive approaches.
- Special teams had an outsized impact on the final result.
Ultimately, the Seahawks prevailed 6–3 in a contest remembered not for offensive fireworks but for precision, discipline, and the fine margins that make American football such a compelling strategic sport.On December 26–27, 2024, the Seattle Seahawks traveled to Soldier Field in Chicago to face the Chicago Bears in a Week 17 NFL matchup that would become one of the lowest-scoring games of the 2024 NFL season. In a defensive-slanted contest, Seattle emerged victorious with a final score of 6–3.
This article explores not just the Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsbox score, but every angle of how players performed — from quarterbacks and running backs to receivers and defenders — placing these numbers in context and explaining their significance.
1. Game Overview
This matchup stood out not for Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsoffensive fireworks but for defensive resiliency, situational execution, and field position battles. The Seahawks’ special teams ultimately decided the game, as Jason Myers converted both of Seattle’s field goal attempts, while Chicago’s Cairo Santos connected on one.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Final |
| SEA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| CHI | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
This low score reflects twoSeahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats teams locking down offenses and forcing sustained drives to fail before the red zone.
2. Offensive Summary
Seattle Seahawks Offense
The Seahawks’ offense generated 265 total yards —Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats led slightly more by the passing game than the ground attack — but crucially controlled key moments to set up scoring opportunities.
Chicago Bears Offense
Chicago managed 179 total yards, struggling to sustain long Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsdrives and adjusting on the fly against Seattle’s defensive front.
3. Player Stats Breakdown
Let’s examine how individual players performed inSeahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats the key offensive categories.
3.1 Quarterback Play
Seattle Seahawks — Geno Smith
| Statistic | Value |
| Comp/Att | 17/23 |
| Passing Yards | 160 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| QB Rating | ~92.7 |
Analysis:
Smith delivered an efficient, mistake-Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Statsfree performance. While the stat line doesn’t include touchdowns, his accuracy kept Seattle ahead of the Bears’ defense and limited turnovers in a cold-weather environment where possessions were scarce.
His ability to make timely completions — especially on third downs — helped Seattle sustain drives just long enough to flip field position and position Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player StatsMyers for scoring chances.
Chicago Bears — Caleb Williams
| Statistic | Value |
| Comp/Att | 16/28 |
| Passing Yards | 122 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| QB Rating | ~53.0 |
Analysis:
Williams showed flashes in his rookie season, but in this game, Seattle’s pass rush and coverage limited his ability to stretch the field. The interception — which came at a pivotal moment following a Bears possession flip — prevented Chicago from converting momentum into points.
Chicago’s offensive plan also leaned heavily on the run,Seahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats so Williams saw fewer opportunities to push the ball deep or generate big plays.
3.2 Rushing Attack
Seattle Seahawks Rushing Leaders
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average |
| Zach Charbonnet | 15 | 57 | 3.8 |
| Kenny McIntosh | 7 | 46 | 6.6 |
| Geno Smith | 3 | 19 | 6.3 |
Analysis:
The run game was methodical, not explosive. Charbonnet’s carries kept defenses honest, while McIntosh made the most of limited touches with a high average per carry. Geno Smith’s own mobility added a wrinkle when pressure collapsed the pocket.
Chicago Bears Rushing Leaders
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average |
| D’Andre Swift | 12 | 53 | 4.4 |
| Caleb Williams | 5 | 37 | 7.4 |
| D. Moore | 2 | 8 | 4.0 |
Analysis:
Swift’s performance was respectable against a stout Seattle front, finishing with a positive average and showing versatility as both a runner andSeahawks vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats receiver. Williams’ runs provided unexpected gains and helped Chicago stay balanced offensively.
3.3 Receiving Game
Top Seahawks Receivers
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average |
| Noah Fant | 4 | 43 | 10.8 |
| DK Metcalf | 3 | 42 | 14.0 |
| Jaxon Smith-Njigba | 3 | 32 | 10.7 |
| Tyler Lockett | 3 | 20 | 6.7 |
| Others | — | — | — |
Analysis:
Fant and Metcalf were the offensive bright spots. In a game lacking deep threats from Chicago, both tight ends and wideouts operated in intermediate routes, moving the chains and creating manageable third-down situations.
Top Bears Receivers
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average |
| DJ Moore | 6 | 54 | 9.0 |
| D’Andre Swift | 4 | 28 | 7.0 |
| Keenan Allen | 5 | 25 | 5.0 |
| Rome Odunze | 1 | 15 | 15.0 |
Analysis:
Moore was the Bears’ most consistent target, finding separation on intermediate routes and making contested catches when necessary. Allen and Odunze offered additional looks, but Seattle’s secondary limited explosive gains.
4. Defensive Impact
Though statistics above focus on offensive output, defense was the true story of this game.
Seattle Seahawks Defense
Seattle held its opponents under three points — a defense that rarely allows big plays. The pass rush consistently pressured Williams, resulting in sacks and forcing hurried throws.
Chicago Bears Defense
Chicago’s defense bent but rarely broke, limiting Seattle’s big play potential. Chicago’s ability to make plays on third downs kept the contest within reach until the final whistle.
5. Special Teams — The Difference Maker
In a game with no offensive touchdowns, special teams played a decisive role.
- Jason Myers (SEA): 2/2 field goals (27 yd & 50 yd)
- Cairo Santos (CHI): 1/1 field goal (42 yd)
With two successful attempts, Myers accounted for all of Seattle’s points. His long field goal was vital in a contest where sustaining drives was difficult against elite defensive units.
6. Strategic Takeaways
Seahawks
- Ball control and possession allowed Seattle to flip field position.
- Defensive pressure on Williams limited Chicago’s offensive consistency.
- Converting field goals when in range was the key to victory.
Bears
- The Bears’ defense showed grit, but the offense lacked sustained efficiency.
- Chicago’s run game was serviceable, but the passing attack couldn’t generate explosive plays.
- Turnovers at critical times limited scoring potential.
7. Historical Context — Head-to-Head Trends
Looking beyond this specific matchup:
- Overall, Seattle holds an edge in the entire history of Bears vs Seahawks matchups with more wins.
- This defensive contest mirrors several previous low-scoring battles in the rivalry.
While the rivalry has seen varying offensive outputs, this 6–3 game stands as one of the more defensive and tightly contested games.
8. Player Spotlight — Season Big Picture
Caleb Williams (Bears)
Despite this game’s challenge, Williams was recognized as the Chicago Bears’ Offensive Player of the Year, leading franchise records in passing yards and clutch drives.
His development as a young quarterback provides optimism for Bears fans and executives alike.
9. What It Meant for the Season
For the Seahawks, this victory helped solidify a playoff push and demonstrated resilience in tight games — a hallmark of good teams.
For the Bears, the narrow loss highlighted areas for growth:
- Consistent offensive success
- Red zone execution
- Quarterback protection
Still, the season featured notable growth, including clinching the NFC North division title — the first time since 2018 — proving their overall trajectory was positive.
Aký bol konečný výsledok a skóre hráčov v poslednom zápase Seahawks vs Bears?
Seattle Seahawks 6 – Chicago Bears 3. Žiadne touchdowny – len field goals (Jason Myers 2× pre SEA, Cairo Santos 1× pre CHI). Obrana Seahawks dominovala.
Kto bol najlepší passer v zápase?
Geno Smith (SEA): 17/23 na 160 yardov, 0 TD, 0 INT, rating 92.7. Caleb Williams (CHI): 16/28 na 122 yardov, 0 TD, 1 INT (game-sealing interception).
Ktorý running back mal najviac rushing yardov?
Zach Charbonnet (SEA): 15 att, 57 yds (3.8 avg). D’Andre Swift (CHI): 12 att, 53 yds. Seahawks mali celkovo 122 rushing yds vs Bears 103.
Kto mal najlepší receiving výkon?
DK Metcalf (SEA) mal 3 catches na 42 yds (ale aj penalty). Noah Fant (SEA): 4 rec, 43 yds. DJ Moore (CHI): 6 rec, 54 yds (najviac pre Bears).
Koľko sacks mali obrany?
Seahawks defense: 7 sacks (Leonard Williams 2, ostatní po 1 vrátane Derick Hall, Jarran Reed). Bears: 3 sacks na Geno Smitha. Williams bol sacked 7×, čo je rekordný tlak na rookieho.
Kto urobil game-winning play?
Riq Woolen (SEA) zachytil interception na Caleb Williamsovi v záverečnej minúte (na Seattle 29-yard line), čím ukončil posledný drive Bears.
Aký bol celkový yardage tímov?
Seahawks: 265 total yards (143 passing + 122 rushing). Bears: 179 total yards (76 passing + 103 rushing). Veľmi nízke čísla kvôli dažďu a obranám.
Ako dopadli turnovers?
Oba tímy mali 1 turnover. Seahawks: žiadne INT, Bears: 1 INT (Woolen). Žiadne fumble straty.
Kto mal najviac tackles alebo defenzívne highlights?
Leonard Williams (SEA) mal 2 sacks + vysoký pressure rate (18.2%). Tariq Woolen: game-clinching INT. Bears defense držala Seahawks na nízkych bodoch, ale neuspela v clutch momente.
Prečo bol zápas taký low-scoring (najnižší v sezóne)?
Daždivé podmienky, silné obrany (7 sacks SEA), slabá ofenzíva Bears (Caleb sacked 7×), Seahawks sa spoliehali na run game a field goals. Žiadny TD v zápase.
Ako to ovplyvnilo playoff šance tímov?
Seahawks (9-7 po zápase) si udržali šancu na NFC West (potrebovali pomoc od Cardinals). Bears (4-12) prehrali 10. zápas v rade, sezóna skončená.
Ktorí hráči Seahawks mali penalty problémy?
DK Metcalf: viackrát unnecessary roughness (shoved Tyrique Stevenson, headbutt threat), 2 flags na jednom drive. Stále problém s disciplínou.
Aký bol 3rd down efficiency?
Seahawks: 5/13 (38%). Bears: 5/15 (33%). Oba tímy bojovali o konverzie.
Kto bol kľúčový v rushing pre Seahawks?
Zach Charbonnet (57 yds) a Kenny McIntosh (46 yds na 7 att, vrátane 25-yd run). Geno Smith pridal 19 yds scramblingom.
Kde nájdem kompletný box score a player stats?
Najlepšie zdroje: ESPN (boxscore), Pro-Football-Reference (detailný play-by-play), Seahawks.com alebo NFL.com game center. Hľadaj “Seahawks vs Bears Dec 26 2024 box score”.
10. Conclusions — The Seahawks vs Bears Match in Retrospect
This matchup was a master class in defensive strategy, field position battles, and value-based football where points were earned one yard at a time, and every possession mattered.
Key takeaways:
- Both teams displayed disciplined execution.
- Player stats reflected controlled, cautious offensive approaches.
- Special teams had an outsized impact on the final result.
Ultimately, the Seahawks prevailed 6–3 in a contest remembered not for offensive fireworks but for precision, discipline, and the fine margins that make American football such a compelling strategic sport.
